Thursday, September 30, 2010

Four Suicides in a Week Take a Toll on Fort Hood

Four Suicides in a Week Take a Toll on Fort Hood

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/us/30hood.html

By JAMES C. McKINLEY Jr.
September 29, 2010

HOUSTON ­ Four veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan died
this week from what appeared to be self-inflicted gunshot wounds at
Fort Hood in central Texas, raising the toll of soldiers who died
here at their own hands to a record level and alarming Army commanders.

So far this year, Army officials have confirmed that 14 soldiers at
Fort Hood have committed suicide. Six others are believed to have
taken their own lives but a final determination has yet to be made.
The highest number of suicides at Fort Hood occurred in 2008, when 14
soldiers killed themselves, said Christopher Haug, a military spokesman.

About 46,000 to 50,000 active officers and soldiers work at the base
at any given time, making this year's suicide rate about four times
the national average, which the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention estimates at 11.5 deaths per 100,000 people.

The largest base in the United States, Fort Hood and the surrounding
communities have suffered high rates of crime, domestic violence,
suicide and various mental illnesses as wave after wave of soldiers
have been deployed abroad over nine years of continual warfare, often
serving more than one tour.

Last November, an Army psychiatrist, Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, was charged
with killing 13 people with a pistol in a rampage at a building on the post.

On Sunday, Sgt. Michael Timothy Franklin and his wife, Jesse Ann
Franklin, were found fatally shot in their house on the base.

Army investigators said they believed that Sergeant Franklin, who was
31 and had served two tours in Iraq, killed his wife and then turned
the gun on himself. The couple had two small children.

Maj. Gen. William F. Grimsley, the Fort Hood senior commander, said
in a statement released at a news conference on Wednesday that
"leaders at all levels remain deeply concerned about this trend."

Mr. Haug said that the general did not believe that additional
measures were necessary to stop the trend and that the base already
had an extensive suicide-prevention program.

But advocates for soldiers who have suffered mental breakdowns said
the programs were not effective.

Cynthia Thomas runs the Under the Hood Café, an organization of
antiwar activists and veterans who provide referrals for soldiers to
mental health professionals. She said a stigma remained among
soldiers about seeking help from Army counselors for suicidal
thoughts or other mental problems. And those soldiers who do seek
counseling are often given medication and put back on duty, she said.

"You don't get counseling, you get medication," Ms. Thomas said.
"These soldiers are breaking."

.

Not ready for wave of damaged soldiers

Hidden Wounds:
Military, community not ready for wave of damaged soldiers

http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2010/09/30/1034698?sac=Home

Sep 30, 2010
By Jennifer Calhoun

Fort Bragg Spc. John Brack is broken.

He's a backwoods Georgia boy who joined the Army and became a combat
medic to save people.

Now, he's so swallowed up by post-traumatic stress disorder that he
has only one real emotion left for the world: anger. The rest, he
says, he fakes.

Brack is 30 years old and his third marriage is over. He's in a
custody fight over his children. A few weeks ago, he was in a
Cumberland County courtroom awaiting trial on an assault charge when
the case was dismissed because the alleged victim decided not to testify.

For more than a year, Brack has taken a cocktail of medications to
relieve PTSD, the anger and other problems that began after his time
in a region of Iraq known as the Triangle of Death.

"I have one pill to be this way, and one to be that way," Brack says.
"One to sleep, and one to wake up. One for no nightmares, and one for
the headaches and the migraines."

He sees a psychiatrist at Womack Army Medical Center once a month. He
sees a psychologist every two weeks. Two of his children needed
counseling, as well.

When his children weren't living with him, he says, he drank to pass
out and keep the nightmares at bay.

Now he takes enough pills to stay what he calls "comfortably numb"
while he waits for a medical discharge from the Army.

He doesn't look much beyond that. As he says, with PTSD "your
give-a-damn is shattered."

Brack is one of thousands of service members suffering from the
hidden wounds of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. No one can say just
how many Fort Bragg soldiers are fighting their own battles with
PTSD, depression or other lingering effects of combat. No one knows
how many will stay in Fayetteville and the surrounding area after
their service.

What is clear is that the community - military and civilian - isn't
ready to provide all the resources that damaged soldiers and broken
families will need.

The Fayetteville Observer has spent months examining the handling of
mental health issues created by nine years of war. That reporting
shows that the Army, Fort Bragg, the veterans health system and the
civilian community are doing more than ever before to address the
problems that soldiers and their families face.

But the problem is growing; more soldiers are suffering.

"They were saying there'd be an epidemic of PTSD cases 10 years from
now," said Richard Varela. He's a Vietnam veteran turned counselor in
Fayetteville. "It's a problem which is still on the horizon and
getting bigger. What we have seen is the beginning of the worst of it."

And the worst of it, according to the studies of PTSD, is more crime,
drug and alcohol abuse, broken families and damaged children,
domestic violence, homelessness and suicide.

The response to the problem, the Observer's examination shows, can't
be left up to the military or veterans programs. Instead, evidence
suggests that addressing PTSD in a military community requires a
broad approach that includes:

An improved national commitment - demonstrated through federal
spending - to take care of soldiers who have volunteered for war and
come home broken.

A civilian community, including law enforcement and the court system,
engaged in understanding the mental health problems facing soldiers
and veterans and willing to explore creative responses.

A stronger commitment from the military to fight the stigma attached
to seeking mental health treatment.

As combat deployments have stretched to nine years, the military has
recognized the mental health problems the long wars have created. The
military has done more to understand and address those problems than
it has during any previous conflict.

The Army and the Department of Defense commissioned studies of their
own and gave outside researchers access to hundreds of thousands of
medical records to learn more about the problems associated with combat stress.

Hundreds of new programs are aimed at helping service members and
their families. Military commanders and installations provide troops
with information on suicide prevention, access to marriage workshops
and training on the signs of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Fort Bragg went from 38 behavioral health care providers in 2004 to 88 today.

Francisco Hernandez Jr. is an example of how the Army's new emphasis
on responding to combat stress can work.

When he broke down on his third tour of duty in Iraq, the Army took
action through the AW2 program for Wounded Warriors.

Hernandez was airlifted out of the country and given treatment
immediately. The assistance he received included medical care,
insurance, job training and help with obtaining veterans benefits
once he was given a medical discharge.

Hernandez is still struggling with PTSD, but he has a job, is in
school and is beginning to build a life.

While the military has made significant advances, the Army did come
under criticism this summer from its own task force studying
suicides. Basically, the task force found that the Army is not doing
an adequate job of collecting and reporting the statistics related to
such things as PTSD and prescription drug use, complicating the
identification of trends and issues.

As much as the military has done to respond to problems related to
combat stress, it isn't enough, according to military officials,
veterans advocates and community activists. What is needed, they say,
is a national effort to make sure that the money and programs are in
place to take care of the people who served.

That includes an infusion of funding into the military health care
system, an expansion of veterans programs and a reassessment of
reimbursement rates for civilian counselors who get the spillover of patients.

Counselors at Fort Bragg and the Fayetteville Veterans Affairs
Medical Center often have long waiting periods for an initial
appointment. From October 2009 through August, Fort Bragg's hospital
referred 1,519 soldiers to civilian counselors because counselors at
Womack were so booked that the soldiers couldn't be seen within 28 days.

"If we didn't have more business than we can handle, we wouldn't be
sending people into the community," said Lt. Col. Jay Earles, who
runs Fort Bragg's behavioral health care division. "The demand
clearly has gone up, and I'm not anticipating it going down."

But some private counselors aren't enthusiastic about military
patients because they don't want to take payments from Tricare, the
military insurance plan. Thomas Harbin, a Fayetteville psychologist,
said reimbursements have actually dropped in the past 20 years.
Currently, counselors get $86 for an hour of psychological counseling.

The Fayetteville VA has its own burden. Since January, the VA has
served more than 5,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans with only four
case managers. The caseload is double what it was for the entire year
of 2006, officials said.

As the population of Afghanistan and Iraq veterans grows,
Fayetteville homeless advocates are more worried. They know that some
veterans struggling with problems such as PTSD will end up on the
streets, but shelter space is limited.

The city's shelters have a total of about 100 beds, said Denise
Giles, director of the Cumberland Interfaith Hospitality Network.

In 2008, Giles counted 40 veterans out of the city's almost 1,200
homeless people. That number more than doubled in 2009, she said.

Giles said the community has struggled for years to get the federal
grants necessary to build adequate shelters and housing for veterans.
But, so far, that hasn't happened, and the fallout could hit in a
year or two, she said.

"I think that any time you have war, you're going to have a
percentage of those soldiers unable to function on a day-to-day
basis," she said. "It's going to impact their ability to maintain housing."

Bridget Booth, a social work case manager for Afghanistan and Iraq
veterans at the VA, is already seeing those problems.

"Some are living in cars or shelters," Booth said. "The money from
the military has been cut off, and they can't hold down a job because
of PTSD or some other health problem."

Money is flowing to the problems. Over the past three years, for
instance, Congress has increased the budget of the Department of
Veterans Affairs by $23 billion, or 60 percent. The Department of
Defense has poured money into programs and additional counseling staff.

But those watching the problem grow are concerned that the response
isn't enough.

"We've got a lot of work yet to do," said U.S. Rep. Bob Etheridge,
whose district is home to thousands of soldiers and veterans.

Richard Allen Smith, a veterans advocate with VoteVets.org, said he
doesn't know how the public will react to hefty expenditures for veterans.

"I hope they say, 'We're glad to pay it,' " Smith said. "After all,
these are the people that volunteered to fight for their country when
it decided to go to war."

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr said the country needs to keep the promise it
has made to the military. That promise can be summed up simply: If a
soldier is damaged, physically or mentally, the country owes him its
best effort to put things right.

"You can't cut promises," Burr said.

In Fayetteville and other communities around Fort Bragg, officials
can't afford to wait for the military or federal government to
address the problems associated with stressed soldiers.

John Lesica, a child psychiatrist with the Cumberland County Mental
Health Center, believes an influx of troubled soldiers and veterans
is inevitable. He said civilian agencies need to gear up.

Part of that, he said, is better communication and coordination with
Fort Bragg about needs and resources.

"There is so little being done on the front end," he said. "We seem
to take care of things on the back end."

That back end can be the criminal justice system. Studies show that
PTSD can lead to crime such as drug abuse and domestic violence. But
Fayetteville police, the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office and the
county's court system don't keep track of whether offenders are
soldiers or veterans.

"We don't have the resources to do that," said Beth Keever, the
county's chief District Court judge. "That's a pat answer, but
sometimes pat answers are true."

Robert Stanulis, a psychologist who has testified as an expert
witness for soldiers with PTSD charged with crimes, believes such
tracking could expose trends and determine where more services are needed.

Debbie Tanna, a spokeswoman for the Cumberland County Sheriff's
Office, said the department has never tracked soldiers by criminal offense.

"It's simple," Tanna wrote in an e-mail. "Law enforcement deals
strictly with arresting those who commit crimes. We are not
interested in their employment status and do not track any employment
status for 'trends.'

"Additionally, we are not psychologists, so therefore the subject of
possible mental health conditions, as a result of war and
deployments, is far beyond our charge. We are cops - not doctors.''

Stanulis said that type of response is common from law enforcement
agencies across the country. But it's a mistake, he said.

He believes if officers start to identify veterans who have mental
health problems, they can head off trouble.

In a growing number of communities, officials are trying to help
veterans who get in trouble through courts set up to address their needs.

Studies have shown the veterans courts, which have popped up in more
than 40 places across the country, have cut down on repeat offenders
and jail time.

"It's been remarkable," said Robert Russell Jr., a judge in Buffalo,
N.Y., who presides over veterans court sessions. "Lives have been
stabilized and gotten back on track. Those who were homeless now have
stable housing. Those that were having challenges with families and
children are getting help."

Cumberland County doesn't have such a court, but officials from the
courts, the VA, the Mental Health Center and Fayetteville police met
recently to discuss a similar program, Keever said.

She favors a "mental health court" that would handle veterans and
others with mental health problems. County officials, with the help
of the VA, are looking for grant money to establish the program.

"I think a mental health court is an excellent idea because we have
folks who are consistently in and out of the jail because they have
mental health issues that are not being treated," Keever said.

Jessie Garner is a minister who reaches out to the homeless. He is
worried that those ranks will swell as more veterans struggle to cope
with the trauma of war.

As he sees it, local government and local agencies have an obligation
to step up to help with the problems of veterans, who are, after all,
members of the community themselves.

Otherwise, he said, the sign in downtown Fayetteville that designates
the city as a "Soldier Sanctuary" is just a sign.

"What are you giving them besides this sign and this park?" Garner
asked, referring to the state veterans park under construction
downtown. "You've got to help them. They need a real sanctuary."

Soldiers also need to seek help when they have problems. But the
Army's push to reach its troops with problems continues to be
undermined by the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment.

Sgt. Dany Cavalier, a soldier who has served three tours of duty in
Iraq, faced nightmares and emotional numbness after his second
deployment. But he chose to battle his demons on his own.

After all, he thought, a soldier should be able to control his emotions.

The military's emphasis on personal toughness and the concern that a
mental health problem could harm a career keep as many as half of the
soldiers with problems from seeking help, an Army task force said.

That task force, which studied suicide prevention, released a report
in July calling the stigma associated with seeking care the biggest
deterrent to soldiers getting help. And, the report said, the
soldiers who needed help most were the least likely to seek it.

Fort Bragg officials said they have worked to remove that stigma.
Larry Holland, a retired chaplain who runs the suicide prevention
program at Fort Bragg, said the culture has changed from the days
when speaking about mental health problems was discouraged.

"I can guarantee you that now, (officers) know the culture," Holland
said. "Fire would rain down on them if they're not taking care of
their soldiers."

But some enlisted soldiers interviewed for this story still worry
that speaking to a therapist would jeopardize their careers or make
them seem weak among their peers.

The fear remains that a promotion or security clearance could be held
up merely because of a past decision to visit a counselor, despite
the Army's assurances otherwise.

Two staff sergeants interviewed while eating lunch in Spring Lake
said they would never use the Army's mental health system. They
refused to speak to a reporter about the subject unless their names
were withheld.

There's what the Army leadership says, and then there's reality, one
of the soldiers said.

"The truth is, it can close some doors for you," he said.

His lunch partner said she's constantly angry since returning from
nearly 18 months in Iraq. She has a hard time enjoying life.

She said she knows she needs help. But would she speak to an Army counselor?

"Not on my life," she said. "I want to finish my career."

Barbara Black, a substance abuse counselor at Alternative Care
Treatment Systems in Fayetteville and a former soldier, said problems
that aren't addressed now will only get worse with time.

"But it takes the soldiers buying into it," she said.

Jim Johnson was a chaplain in Vietnam. He lived horrors. Thirty years
later, after he retired from the military and became a counselor, the
inescapable memories of war broke him.

He had to retire from counseling other veterans and deal with his own PTSD.

Johnson says the traumas of the current wars won't be any easier to shake.

The nightmares that built up in patrols in Kandahar or missions in
Baghdad will continue to haunt some soldiers for years, even decades.

Capt. Dan Urquhart, a chaplain with the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade
who has seen deployment firsthand, says that no one comes back from
war unchanged.

Most readjust readily to life at home; some seem unable to leave the
war behind.

Johnson and Urquhart have seen for themselves what the studies of
combat trauma point out: Sometimes the damage to a soldier's psyche
can't be fixed. As long as the country sends men and women off to
fight, some will come home irrevocably damaged.

But Urquhart and Johnson, counselors and commanders, veterans
advocates and soldiers' spouses agree on one point: All of the men
and women who served deserve an Army that is open to helping them, a
community that is willing to work with them and a country that
doesn't count the cost of giving them their best chance at healing.
--

Staff writer Jennifer Calhouncan be reached at
calhounj@fayobserver.com or486-3595.

.

Risk of gap between US military and society: Gates

Risk of gap between US military and society: Gates

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4812947&c=AME&s=TOP

by Dan De Luce
Sep 29, 2010

DURHAM, North Carolina (AFP) – Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned
on Wednesday that the all-volunteer US military could become
alienated from the rest of society, with recruits and bases
concentrated in more rural, conservative areas.

Gates said most Americans were untouched by the fighting in Iraq and
Afghanistan and few had relatives or friends in the armed forces, as
less than one percent of the population was serving in uniform.

"Whatever their fond sentiments for men and women in uniform, for
most Americans the wars remain an abstraction," he said in a speech
at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.

War was merely "a distant and unpleasant series of news items that
does not affect them personally," he added.

He said an increasing number of service members came from the South
and the Mountain West, which was also where more military bases were
located, while fewer recruits came from more left-leaning cities in
the Northeast and Pacific Coast.

Although Gates lauded the all-volunteer force, launched in the 1970s,
as a "remarkable success," he said there was a potential gap emerging
between the military and civilian society.

"There is a risk over time of developing a cadre of military leaders
that politically, culturally, and geographically have less and less
in common with the people they have sworn to defend," he said.

Gates said that the bitter fallout from the Vietnam War also meant
many elite universities no longer allowed the US military to run
reserve officer training programs from campuses.

The result was "neither good for the academy or the country," he said
expressing hope that top universities would restore their connection
to the armed forces.

Gates made an indirect reference to Harvard University, saying one of
its alumni, President Barack Obama, had urged it to reopen its campus
to officer training.

To rebuild the link between the military and leading colleges, Gates
said it was vital that university students consider joining up.

He told the Duke University audience that putting on a uniform
offered unique challenges and a chance to shape the country's future,
despite the lethal risks of combat.

"So I would encourage you and all young Americans, especially those
at the most selective universities who may not have considered the
military, to do so. To go outside your comfort zone and take a risk
in every sense of the word," he said.

"Because, if America's best and brightest young people will not step
forward, who then can we count on to protect and sustain the
greatness of this country?"

Gates ruled out a return to conscription and offered no policy
proposals. Instead, he raised questions about the "dilemmas"
associated with having a "tiny sliver of America" fighting the country's wars.

"Going back to compulsory service, in addition to being politically
impossible, is highly impractical given the kinds of technical
skills, experience, and attributes needed to be successful on the
battlefield in the 21st century."

But he said the strains on the volunteer force were building, amid
rising suicide and divorce rates.

"How long can these brave and broad young shoulders carry the burden
that we -- as a military, as a government, as a society -- continue
to place on them?"

The Pentagon chief said the price tag of the all-volunteer force was
rising dramatically, particularly due to sky-rocketing health care
costs, and that the government would face tough decisions in the years ahead.

Leaders would face a challenge in funding "an equitable and
sustainable system of military pay and benefits that reflects the
realities of this century," he added.

.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Recession helping recruitment

Recession helping recruitment

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/recession-99192-direct-high.html

September 19, 2010
By Nancy Pasternack

A direct hit from the recession was what drove Pvt. Kenneth Dascenzi to enlist.

The 2005 Marysville High School graduate had considered the Army five
years ago.

"But I got a good job," he said of the work that had him repairing
heating and air conditioning systems.

At about the time that the bank failures, housing crisis and
plummeting jobs market began sinking into the American psyche as
something more than a short-term setback, Dascenzi's employer cut his
hours and pay in half ­ and suddenly his good job didn't look so good anymore.

With national unemployment figures hovering near 10 percent and the
local situation nearly twice as bad, Dascenzi's choice to don a
military uniform has become a popular one.

For the first time, the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines are
reporting numbers that far exceed recruitment goals.

"We have a lot of walk-ins," said Sgt. 1st Class Sherri Roundtree,
who took over at Yuba City's Army recruitment office off Gray Avenue
two months ago.

Her job has not always been so easy. Roundtree worked out of an
office in south Sacramento, where several factors, including a more
affluent and liberal target group, challenged her ability to keep up
with quotas.

"It was pretty rough in 2005," she said of slow months when consumer
confidence and housing prices were still soaring and jobs were plentiful.

Now, the economy's psychological effects alone are doing much of the work.

Pfc. Dustin Buwal, 18, graduated from River Valley High School in
2009 and headed for college at Sacramento State University.

"But I was distracted," he said. "I was worried about the uncertainty
of getting a job when I got out."

After one semester, he was ready to join the Army.

Last week, he and Dascenzi, 23, were back home on temporary recruiter
duty in Yuba City, waiting for their first post-basic-training
assignments to begin in early October.

Buwal is headed to Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., where he'll attend a
military-police training school. Dascenzi will continue his training
as a field medic while stationed at Fort Hood, Texas.

Both know they're likely to deploy to the Middle East, and possibly soon.

"I know as a combat medic I'm going to be in the fight," said Dascenzi.

His family has faced these kinds of facts before. His brother is a
Navy submariner.

Buwal, on the other hand, had some convincing to do. "They wanted me
to finish college," he said of his parents.

Roundtree knows this scenario and the difficulty young men and women
face when making a choice that goes against their family members' wishes.

"The biggest challenge in this job," she said, "is parents, parents, parents."

The dearth of employment opportunities in the Yuba-Sutter area has
made some of them a bit more understanding.

Roundtree reviewed some recent numbers on a series of complicated
spreadsheets ­ something she does frequently. The counts are called
up by ZIP code and compared with those of other military branches for
both high school seniors and graduates.

The numbers are nearly all up, and quality recruits ­ those with high
scores on the military assessment test ­ have increasingly gone Army.

"Historically, the Air Force dominates Marysville," Roundtree said.
"But now, it's both us and the Air Force kicking butt."

Buwal and Dascenzi have been spending a bit of time now on the other
side of the recruitment tables, talking to high school seniors during
daily rounds of the campuses.

Dascenzi tells them he is now getting paid for education and
experience in the same field he plans, eventually, to pursue ­ health
care. He hopes to work at a hospital one day, maybe as a surgical
nurse, he said.

Buwal said he may just stay in the military.

"A lot of people just work their job and go home," he said. "We have
a solid income and don't have to worry about losing our jobs."
--

CONTACT Nancy Pasternack at 749-4712 or npasternack@ appealdemocrat.com

.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

A letter to the DREAM movement

A letter to the DREAM movement

http://socialistworker.org/2010/09/22/letter-to-the-dream-movement

September 22, 2010
by Raúl Al-qaraz Ochoa

Student activists for immigrant rights have pushed the DREAM Act into
the national spotlight with a series of bold actions--kicked off with
a sit-in at the Arizona office of Sen. John McCain in May. DREAM
stands for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors
Act, which would provide a path to legalization for a minority of
undocumented youth--provided they either enrolled in college in
pursuit of a bachelor's degree or higher, or enlisted in the U.S. military.

But in a cynical maneuver, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid attached
the DREAM Act to the Senate's $670 billion defense appropriations
bill to fund the U.S. war machine. In other words, anyone who wanted
to support the DREAM Act had to also support funding for the Pentagon
and its wars and occupations.

Even that ploy couldn't appease Republicans and right-wing Democrats.
The defense bill--with both the DREAM Act and a provision overturning
the anti-LGBT "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the military
attached--was blocked from coming to a final vote under Senate rules
by the unanimous opposition of Republican senators plus two Democrats.

In a statement to fellow activists written last weekend and
distributed widely on the Internet, Raúl Al-qaraz Ochoa, one of the
group who sat in at McCain's office last May, explained why he
decided to oppose the DREAM Act after it was attached to the war spending bill.
--

I HAVE supported the DREAM Act, despite my critiques and concerns
over the military service component. In fact, I was one of the
arrestees at the sit-in at John McCain's office in Tucson, Ariz., an
act of civil disobedience where four brave undocumented students
risked deportation and put the DREAM Movement back in the national
political stage.

I made peace with my participation because I felt I was supporting
the self-determination of a movement led by undocumented youth, and I
felt we could subvert the component that was to feed undocumented
youth into the military pipeline if we developed a plan to support
youth to the college pathway.

First, let me say that I applaud and admire the tireless work you
have all done for the past 10 years. Your commitment and dedication
parallels giant student movements of the civil rights era. Your
persistence in organizing even when the world turned their back on
you is inspiring; your creativity in tactics, visuals and media
strategy is amazing. Your movement gives hope to hundreds of students
I have come across here in Arizona and beyond.

It is because of your grassroots efforts--not the politicians' nor
the national Hispanic organizations'--that the dream is still alive
and has come this far. As an organizer with permanent resident status
privilege, let me assert that your cause for access to college and a
path to legalization is just. No one can tell you that what you are
fighting for is wrong.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WITH THAT said, I want to share how I am deeply appalled and outraged
at how Washington politics are manipulating and co-opting the dream.
I understand that some folks may say, "We just want the DREAM Act to
pass regardless," but it is critical to examine the political context
surrounding DREAM in its current state. It is disturbing to see how
Democrats are attaching our community's dreams for
education/legalization to a defense appropriations bill. This is
grotesque in a number of ways:

-- 1. Democrats are using the DREAM Act as a political stunt to
appeal to Latino voters for the November elections because it is seen
as "less" threatening than a broad immigration reform. The Democrats
have the political will to recently unite and pass a border
militarization bill in a matter of hours ($600 million!), yet they
won't pass a broader immigration reform? And now they are up for the DREAM Act?

I'm glad they feel the pressure of the Latino voting bloc, but they
obviously do not care about our lives. They only seek to secure their
seats in November--which, by the way, look very jeopardized if they
don't move quickly to energize their "base." They are also seeking to
secure the gay vote with the gradual repeal of the "don't ask, don't
tell" policy as part of this same defense bill. All in all,
insincere, token political gestures only serve to stall real justice.

-- 2. Democrats are telling me that if I support access to education
for all my people, I must also support the U.S. war machine with $670
billion for the Pentagon. Does this mean I have to support the
military occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan? By supporting the DREAM
Act, does this mean I automatically give a green light for U.S.
forces to continue invading, killing and raping innocent people all
over the world?

This is really unfair. Here in Arizona, I struggle with a climate of
fear and terror. Yet even though I am so far away, I hear the cries
of Arab mothers who are losing their children in U.S.-sponsored
bombings and massacres. There's a knot in my throat because victims
of U.S. aggression abroad look just like us...victims of U.S.
aggression at home.

This ugly and twisted political system is dividing us and coercing us
into supporting the funding of more bloodshed and more destruction if
we want the DREAM Act to pass. Does this mean that our dreams will
rest upon the nightmares of people that suffer globally? Obviously,
students who call their senators are supporting their future, NOT
bloodshed abroad, but we have to be responsible to the larger
political implications of this.

-- 3. Democrats are vilifying and criminalizing our parents. A really
insulting argument prominently used for passing the DREAM Act that I
keep hearing over and over is that because undocumented students
"didn't choose to come to the U.S. to break the laws of this
country," you shouldn't have to pay for the "sins" or "illegal
behavior" of your parents.

Are they serious?!? It is not okay to allow legislation to pass that
will stand on and disrespect the struggle, sacrifice and dignity of
our parents. What about blaming U.S.-led capitalist and imperialist
policies as the reasons that create our "refugee" populations? Our
parents' struggle is not for sale. We must not fall for or feed into
the rhetoric that criminalizes us or our parents. We all want
justice, but is it true justice if we have to sell out our own family
members along the way?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AGAIN, I support this fight--it's part of a larger community
struggle. It's personal to all of us. Passage of the DREAM Act would
definitely be a step forward in the struggle for migrant justice. Yet
the politicians in Washington have hijacked this struggle from its
original essence and turned dreams into ugly political nightmares. I
refuse to be a part of anything that turns us into political pawns of
dirty Washington politics. I want my people to be "legalized," but at
what cost? We all want it bad. I hear it. I've lived it. But I think
it's a matter of how much we're willing to compromise in order to win
victories or crumbs.

This again proves how it is problematic to lobby the state and put
all our efforts in legislation to pass. We should know that this
political route is always filled with racism, opportunism, betrayals
and nightmares. History repeats itself once again.

So if I support the DREAM Act, does this mean I am okay with our
people being used as political pawns? Does this mean that my hands
will be smeared with the same bloodshed the U.S. spills all over the
world? Does this mean I am okay with blaming my mother and my father
for migrating "illegally" to the U.S.? Am I willing to surrender to
all that in exchange for a benefit?

Maybe it's easier for me to say that "I can" because I have papers,
right? I'd like to think that it's because my political principles
will not allow me to do so, regardless of my citizenship status or
personal benefit at stake. Strong movements that achieve greater
victories are those that stand in solidarity with all oppressed
people of the world and never gain access to rights at the expense of
other oppressed groups.

I have come to a deeply painful decision: I can no longer in good
political conscience support the DREAM Act because the essence of a
beautiful dream has been detained by a colonial nightmare seeking to
fund and fuel the U.S. empire machine.

I am so sorry and so enraged that this larger political context has
deferred those dreams of justice and equality that we all share.

In tears, rage, love and sorrow,

--R
--

First published at Antifronteras.com.
http://antifronteras.com/2010/09/18/letter-to-the-dream-movement-my-painful-withdrawal-of-support-for-the-dream-act/

.

Alien Minors Act could boost U.S. military ranks

Alien Minors Act could boost U.S. military ranks

http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2010-09-23-dreamact23_ST_N.htm

9/23/10
By Alan Gomez

Immigration advocates have long pushed for the DREAM Act as a way to
give children who were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents
a chance to become legal residents and have access to higher education.

The less publicized part of the Development, Relief and Education for
Alien Minors Act is that the Pentagon is pushing for it as a means to
staff the armed forces.

Prospects dimmed Tuesday when Senate Republicans prevented a vote on
a defense spending bill, because the DREAM Act was attached as an
amendment. Senate Democrats vowed to reintroduce it.

When the Department of Defense published its three-year strategic
plan, it listed the DREAM Act as a way it could replenish its ranks.

"If we needed to expand the pool of eligible youth, the (DREAM)
initiative would be one of several ways to do it," spokeswoman Eileen
Lainez said in an e-mail.

Retired Army lieutenant colonel Margaret Stock says a "crisis in
military manpower" is looming as the population ages and the economy
improves. She says the military struggled to recruit enough people
when the economy was booming just a few years ago because people had
more employment options.

"DREAM would give us the ability to tap into a huge number of people
who grew up in the United States, were educated here, they talk like
Americans, they look like Americans and their loyalty lies with
America," says Stock, a former West Point professor who teaches
political science at the University of Alaska-Anchorage.

The act would allow illegal immigrants who met several requirements ­
35 or younger, came to the U.S. before turning 16, have lived here at
least five years, no criminal record and have earned a high school
diploma ­ to become conditional residents for up to six years. They
would be eligible to become permanent residents if they completed two
years of college or two years in the military.

The Migration Policy Institute, a non-partisan research group that
supports an overhaul of immigration law, estimates that more than
725,000 people would be eligible immediately for conditional
residency. An additional 1.4 million would meet all the requirements
except the high school diploma.

The military part of the act worries Jorge Mariscal, director of
Latino studies at the University of California-San Diego.

He says many illegal immigrant families are too poor to pay for college.

"Our concern is that people are just going to get trapped for
economic reasons into the military," says Mariscal, who otherwise
supports the DREAM Act.

Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, which advocates lower
levels of legal and illegal immigration, opposes the DREAM Act
because it does not address the larger problems of illegal immigration.

Felipe Matos would be glad to join the military under the DREAM Act.

Born to a single mother in the slums of Brazil, he came to live with
relatives in the U.S. at 14. He graduated from high school, got an
associate's degree at Miami Dade College and hopes to get a four-year
degree and become a high school teacher. He says he wants to repay
the country that gave him the opportunity to succeed.

"I have friends who would have loved to join the military," says
Matos, 24. "I feel that all of us are just trying to serve and
contribute to the only country we know and love."

.

Military hopefuls continue to grow outside McCain's office

Military hopefuls continue to grow outside McCain's office

http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/military-hopefuls-continue-to-grow-outside-mccain%27s-office

09/19/2010
By: Courtney Craig

PHOENIX - A group of undocumented youths asking to join the military
spent their fourth day in a row outside Arizona Senator John McCain's
Phoenix office.

The group is calling themselves the "DREAM Army".

The aspiring servicemen are backed by a group of over 50 supporters,
who gathered for a vigil Sunday night in Phoenix at the corner of
Missouri and 16th streets.

"On Thursday my DREAM Army started with just two recruits, both
undocumented and like me wanting to just have a chance to serve in
the military. Now, just four days later, there are almost a dozen of
us training and working on our drills hoping to be recognized for our
desire to serve and protect this great country," said Michael
Nazario, the group's organizer.

One of the group's supporters is the Dream Act Coalition, an
organization dedicated to the passage of the DREAM Act.

If passed, the bi-partisan legislation would allow undocumented
youth, who were brought to this country at a young age, to fix their
legal status by joining the military or attaining a two-year college degree.

The DREAM Act is expected to come up for a vote next week.

The DREAM Army is expected to stay camped outside of Senator McCain's
office until at least Monday, when he is expected to be back in Phoenix.

.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Behind the Latest Version of the DREAM Act

Forwarded message:

From: El Organizador
Sent: Sep 21, 2010
Subject: Behind the Latest Version of the DREAM Act: Is This
Legislation We Should Support?

EL ORGANIZADOR
P.O. Box 40009
San Francisco, CA 94140
Tel. 415-641-8616
Email: elorganizador@earthlink.net
----------

Behind the Latest Version of the DREAM Act:
Is This Legislation We Should Support?

By ALEJANDRA JUAREZ

"When that [DREAM Act] passes, millions of children will be able to
get the education they need to contribute to our economy," stated
Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) during his press conference announcing that he
would include the DREAM Act in the Defense Authorization Bill on
September 21. Almost immediately, Republican leaders came out against
the move in spite of the commonly held belief that the DREAM Act is
bipartisan legislation. "I intend to block it, unless they agree to
remove the onerous provisions," said Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).

While Republicans are accusing Democrats of playing partisan politics
in an effort to maintain their footing this coming November,
mobilizations have been taking place across the nation for months now
in an attempt to get Congress and the Obama administration to pass
Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR). Immigrant youth, especially,
have trekked across state lines, protested in congresspersons'
offices, and flooded Congress with letters urging them to pass the
DREAM Act. Called DREAMers, they have come out and risked being
deported in the hope of gaining legal status.

What is the DREAM Act?

The Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act
has been floating in Congress for nearly a decade now, first
introduced in 2001 as H.R. 1918 and S. 1291 in the House and Senate
respectively. In 2007 Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) filed to place the
DREAM Act as an amendment to the 2008 Department of Defense
Authorization Bill (S. 2919), but it failed to pass. A last-ditch
effort was made later that year by introducing the DREAM Act as a
stand alone bill, nevertheless, the 60 votes required to avoid a
filibuster were not there.

The version now being included as an amendment to the Defense
Authorization Bill by Sen. Reid was introduced in March of 2009 by
senators Durbin (D-IL), Lugar (R-IN), Reid (D- NV), Martinez (R-FL),
Leahy (D-VT), Lieberman (I-CT), Kennedy (D-MA), and Feingold (D-WI).

If passed, the DREAM Act of 2009 would give young undocumented
immigrants from any country of origin who are under 35 years old and
who arrived in the United States before age 16 the opportunity to
gain legal status by either attending college or joining the
military. However, only those who have obtained a high school diploma
or GED and have not left the United States in the last five years are
eligible to gain conditional Legal Permanent Residency (LPR).

Once eligibility has been ascertained, LPR status would be granted on
a conditional basis and valid for six years, during which time the
student would be allowed to work, go to school, or join the military.
After six years, if the person has shown good moral character and
either completed a minimum of two years of higher education toward a
bachelor's degree or higher, or served in the military for two years,
the conditional status would be removed and full LPR would be granted.

With any chance of passing CIR now declared dead by many Democratic
leaders, including President Obama, we are being told the DREAM Act
is Plan B , the only viable proposal for addressing the immigration
issue. Just last week Univision's Jorge Ramos proclaimed that there
will be no legalization for the 11 million undocumented this year.
Nor, perhaps, next year -- nor the next. Senator Reid, himself, said,
"I know we can't do comprehensive immigration reform -- I've tried
to. I've tried so very, very hard."

A Rift Has Developed

But although the DREAM Act has unconditional supporters in the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) and other Latino organizations
like the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the
National Council of La Raza (NCLR), in particular, a rift has begun
to appear within the movement that has emerged around the DREAM Act.

Community groups like San Diego's Committee Opposed to Militarism and
the Draft (COMD) has opposed the armed forces provision of the DREAM
Act for years. More recently, even the young activists who have
participated in acts of civil disobedience across the country have
not only questioned the military component but the way in which the
Democrats are contributing to the argument that the parents are
criminals who broke the law by crossing the border illegally in an
attempt to provide a better life for their children. "They are
vilifying and criminalizing our parents and [arguing] that
undocumented students shouldn't pay for the sins or illegal behavior
of their parents," wrote Raul Al-qaraz Ochoa, one of the protesters
arrested at Sen. McCain's office in Arizona this summer.

Still, the majority in the movement uncritically supports the DREAM
Act because they believe its passage will benefit millions of young
undocumented immigrants while also serving as a stepping stone for
CIR down the road. If we examine the legislation closely, however,
some issues arise with these arguments.

First, the simple fact that Democrats are attaching the DREAM Act to
the defense bill speaks to its militaristic orientation; the DREAM
Act forms part of the Department of Defense's FY2010-12 Strategic
Plan to help the military shape and maintain a mission-ready All
Volunteer Force.

According to UC San Diego professor Jorge Mariscal, the DREAM Act was
largely developed by the Pentagon. One need only read Senator
Durbin's testimony. It was not about education. It was strictly about
making a pool of young, bilingual, U.S.-educated, high-achieving
students available to the recruiters.

This is further evidenced in the 2009 policy report "Essential to the
Fight: Immigrants in the Military Eight Years After 9/11," authored
by Margaret D. Stock, retired Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army
Reserve. In it she writes, "Despite the important contributions of
immigrants to the military in the ongoing conflicts, one proposal
that would allow more immigrants to serve in the armed forces [DREAM
Act] has made little headway in the past eight years. ... Because
attending college is a very expensive proposition, ... joining the
armed forces is a likely choice for many of the young people who
would be affected by the bill (p. 8).

Stock concludes, "Without them, the military could not meet its
recruiting goals and could not fill the need for foreign-language
translators, interpreters, and cultural experts. Given the unique and
valuable functions that immigrants often perform in the military,
they are a critical asset to the national defense. Immigrants have
been and continue to be essential to the fight" (p. 11).

At the same time, by attempting to pass the DREAM Act before the
November mid-term elections, Democrats seek to rally support from
Latinos who comprise the largest sector of the immigrant community
and who are a key voting bloc for the Democratic Party.

It was this voting bloc that handed Obama the presidency in 2008,
based largely on the promise that he would deliver CIR during his
first year in office. Having failed to do so -- and, on the contrary,
having increased the repression on the undocumented community through
raids, employer sanctions, and the militarization of the border --
more and more Latinos have grown increasingly discontented with the
Democratic leadership.

It is difficult to imagine a Democratic victory in Congress without
the Latino vote. The Democrats know this and are offering the DREAM
Act as appeasement, claiming there is no political will to pass CIR.
Yet, it took no effort to pass the $600 million border militarization
bill this past August.

Other Objections

Second, according to Sen. Reid and other proponents, passage of the
DREAM Act would benefit millions of undocumented immigrants. Although
it is difficult to know the exact number of undocumented youth in the
United States, the Migration Policy Institute's 2010 study "Dream vs.
Reality: An Analysis of Potential DREAM Act Beneficiaries" claims
that there are approximately 2.1 million who could potentially be eligible.

However, not all would qualify for LPR status. Only an estimated
825,000, or 38%, would be able to gain full LPR. For those
undocumented youths who do not meet the requirements after the six
years of conditional status there is no guaranteed that they would
not be deported. The legislation also authorizes the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to share information with other law
enforcement agencies.

Third, the choice of attending an institution of higher learning, as
opposed to joining the military, in order to qualify for LPR is only
feasible for a small number of undocumented youth. For example,
Latinos in general, compared to other ethnic groups have the lowest
number of college attendees -- only 1.9%, compared to 3% for Blacks,
3.8% for whites, and 8.8% for Asians. The national high school
drop-out rate among Latinos is around 40%. In California the drop-out
rate is 36%.

Moreover, a significant percentage of the 1.5 generation coming to
the United States without papers arrive with very little schooling
and come to work to contribute to the family income. These
undocumented youth would not even qualify for conditional LPR status.

The college option of the DREAM Act must also be looked at within the
new higher education framework where the cost of attending college
becomes another barrier. Throughout the country -- and in California
especially -- the tuition or university fees at public universities
have skyrocketed ... a whopping 32% increase at the UCs and CSUs last
year and 54% at community colleges; not to mention the cap
enrollments and repeal of affirmative action also affecting ethnic minorities.

Under the DREAM Act students would not be eligible for federal
financial aid -- only loans and work study. Moreover, the DREAM Act
gives states the prerogative to decide if these students qualify for
in-state tuition (repealing Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration
Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996).

De-Facto Choice to Gain LPR Status

The military option then becomes the de-facto choice to gain LPR
status for most undocumented youth. There are already non-citizens in
the armed service who are seeking citizenship for themselves and
their loved ones through fast track established by former President
Bush in 2002 as part of the War on Terror.

However, as Professor Mariscal points out, the promise of a green
card is not always assured. Military service does not guarantee
citizenship and tragically for those who have given the ultimate
sacrifice, posthumous citizenship [is] a purely symbolic gesture with
no rights or privileges accruing to the deceased person's family.

With the continued occupations in the Middle East and elsewhere, as
well as the increased militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border, it is
very likely that those joining the military under the DREAM Act will
see combat. And although the DREAM Act asks for only two years of
military service, we must be aware that there is no such thing as a
two-year military contract. In 2003 Congress passed the National Call
to Service Plan as part of the Military Appropriations Act. This
mandated that all of the services must create an enlistment program
offering a two-year active duty enlistment option, followed by four
years in the Active Guard/Reserves, followed by two years in the
Inactive Reserves. This is a total of eight years.

If that were not enough, low-income and youth of color tend to see
most of the direct combat. Professor Mariscal writes, "Latinos and
Latinas are bunched together in the private and corporal ranks (or
lowest ranks) and therefore are among the most likely to receive
hazardous duty assignments. ... [In 2001 they] made up 17.7% of the
Infantry, Gun Crews, and Seamanship occupations in all the service
branches. Of those Latinos and Latinas in the Army, 24.7% occupy such
jobs and in the Marine Corps, 19.7%.

It is important to remember that Latinos make up only 13.5% of the
general population. In contrast, in the elite and most highly
romanticized military special operations units such as the Navy
Seals, people of color are virtually non-existent given the stricter
educational admissions criteria.

For a DREAM Act With No Military Strings Attached!

The DREAMers and the movement they have built together with their
allies have fueled the immigrant rights movement in spite of other
setbacks like SB 1070. Undocumented youth are tired of the vast
inequities and limited opportunities afforded to them because of
their citizenship status.

Although the DREAM Act would only benefit a small number of
undocumented immigrant youth, what the DREAMers are fighting for --
the right to education for all, the right to have a job that helps
our families get out of poverty, the right to live without fear of
incarceration and deportation, the right to keep families together --
is the right thing.

All of us in the immigrant rights movement and our allies should
applaud and support their cause and denounce the Democrats for
attempting to usurp the struggle. We should not be asked to assist in
the continued occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, or in any new
militaristic adventures in Latin America, Iran, or elsewhere in order
to obtain papers for our immigrant brothers and sisters. Nor should
we have to subjugate those who look like us in foreign lands or on the border.

We in the immigrant community are not discouraged by the lack of
political will in Washington. We will continue to fight for a new and
just immigration policy based on human and workers' rights.
More than ever, it is necessary to (re)build an independent mass
movement for legalization. It will take huge mobilizations and
strikes like those that took place in the spring of 2006 to force the
ruling elite to grant our just demands.

We must champion the DREAMers movement -- that is, a real DREAM Act
without any militaristic strings attached -- while also calling for:

- No to the militarization of the border; tear down the Wall of Shame!
- Stop the raids and deportations!
- No to the E-Verify Law and to the criminalization of immigrant workers!
- No to Guest Worker Programs!
- No to the separation of immigrant families!
- Repeal the "Free Trade" and Military pacts in Latin America
(including the dismantling of all U.S.
military bases in the region)!

As immigrant rights activist Raul Al-qaraz Ochoa aptly wrote, "Strong
movements that achieve greater victories are those that stand in
solidarity with all oppressed people of the world."

Monday, September 20, 2010

Military cheats wounded vets out of $12 billion in disability claims

Pipeline to hell:
Military cheats wounded vets out of $12 billion in disability claims

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/179/841/Pipeline_to_hell:_Military_cheats_wounded_vets_out_of_12_billion_in_disability_claims.html

Sep 17, 2010
By Monica L. Davis

The greatest military in the world has been turned in to a pipeline
to despair. According to congressional testimony, as many as half a
million wounded veterans have reportedly been coerced, even tortured
into giving up their disability and medical benefit, forced into
signing bogus personality disorder discharge papers. Analysts say the
military has saved more than $12 billion dollars in disability claims
by coercing vets into signing personality disorder discharge papers,
which puts wounded vets and their families on the road to poverty and despair.

Recent congressional testimony by veterans like Sgt. Chuck Luther
revealed that the Army is torturing wounded vets, forcing them to
sign discharge papers which say they have a pre-existing
psychological condition­personality disorder. Personality disorder
discharges are ineligible for VA benefits.

Joshua Kors, a reporter who has followed this issue for more than
three years, says, "Some of these soldiers have been diagnosed with
personality disorder. Personality disorder, being a pre-existing
condition, is separate from a war-related wound, which is only what
the military treats."

Kors was particularly interested in Sgt. Chuck Luther, who was
wounded by mortar fire in Iraq. "Sgt. Luther had a traumatic brain
injury because of the blow to his head. He smashed his head against
concrete, and developed vision problems after that. He would black
out. He said it was like somebody was stabbing him in the eye, and
became blind in one eye. He went to the health unit there, and was
told that his blindness was the result of a 'pre-existing personality
disorder.'"

According to Kors, this is part of a 10 year pattern. "Since 2001,
over 23,000 soldiers have been pressed into signing these documents,
passing off their wounds as pre-existing personality disorders."

When asked how the military has been getting away with this, Kors
says it's different from case to case. "Soldiers have been told by
military doctors 'hey, just go ahead and sign these papers, you're
wounded, it'll get you get you out, and you can deal with this, once
you're out of the military. Some were told they'd get their benefits."

Sgt. Luther refused to sign the documents which said he had a
personality disorder, and that's when his nightmare--torture, began.
He was locked in a closet, and was basically tortured for refusing to
sign the bogus discharge papers. Kors says, "Sgt. Luther was put in a
closet, held there over a month, under enforced sleep deprivation, in
what the Chairman of the Senate Committee in hearings called torture."

"Sgt. Luther was held in that closet for over a month by armed
guards. They kept the lights on all night, blasted heavy metal music,
so he couldn't sleep. He tried to escape the closet at one point.
They pinned him down, injected him with medication, and dragged him
back into the closet. After a month of torture, he was willing to
sign anything."

After he signed the papers, they took him back to Fort Hood. "That's
when they told him the consequences: no disability claim for the rest
of his life. No paid long-time medical care." To add insult to
injury, Sgt. Luther was handed a bill: now he has to pay back his
$1600 sign on bonus.

Kors believes there is a larger pattern, a bigger plan operating
here. After pushing these wounded soldiers to sign papers saying they
had "pre-existing conditions," the military is now able to keep these
soldiers out of the casualty statistics. If they have "pre-existing
conditions," the military isn't responsible for their care, and they
are not counted in the "casualty figures."

Thus, in this "number's game," the wounded soldiers are getting
shafted, and the military placates the public with low-ball casualty
figures. "Of course, everyone knows about the thousands that have
been killed in Afghanistan, and the tense of thousands that are
'officially wounded'".

And, of course, there is the underlying political situation, the
public support of the war­something that is dependent on low-ball
casualty counts. "According to the Rand Corporation, over 400,000
soldiers have suffered brain injuries during these two conflicts
[Iraq and Afghanistan]. If the official count of wounded skyrocketed,
it would just change the dynamics of public support."

The military, active and reserve forces, is roughly 2.1 million
soldiers. Using the Rand Corporation's numbers­400,000 soldiers have
suffered traumatic brain injuries, means fully a quarter of our armed
forces have suffered brain injuries in the two conflicts over a
decade. This doesn't even include other war-related injuries.

These are real people, real injuries, people with major medical
issues­injuries which have been incurred in the military, but the
military refuses to pay for those injuries, claiming the soldiers
problems are due to "personality disorders." This puts the burden on
the now civilian veteran, who not only has no paid veteran's medical
benefits, but who now bears the additional burden of being diagnosed
with a "personality disorder."

This makes the veteran nearly unemployable, in an economy that is
worse than it has been in half a century. Now, the vet has two
problems: his uncovered war injury, and his inability to find a
job­or even work at all, because of his brain injury.

The economy is tough, the worse it has been in 50 years. A newly
released report says that 2009 saw the largest increase in poverty in
51 years. More than 4 million people fell below the poverty line in
2009, bringing the number of people living in poverty to 43.6
million. We have more than a million people in jail or prison, and
many of these people are US military veterans.

If recent trends to discharge wounded veterans with phony personality
disorder discharges continues, tense of thousands of veterans and
their families will join the ranks of the poor. According to the VA,
the number of veterans living in poverty and homelessness has
increased. A million and a half veterans are at risk of being
homeless. Over half of all homeless vets are African-American or Hispanic.
--

Here are a few critical statistics regarding veterans and homelessness:

VA's specialized homeless programs served more than 92,000 veterans
in 2009, which is highly commendable. This still leaves well over
100,000 more veterans, however, who experience homelessness annually
and must seek assistance from local government agencies and
community- and faith-based service organizations. In its November
2007 "Vital Mission" report, the National Alliance to End
Homelessness estimated that up to about half a million veterans have
characteristics that put them in danger of homelessness. These
veterans may require supportive services outside the scope of most VA
homeless programs. www.nchv.org/background.cfm#facts

Veteran-specific highlights from the USICH report include:

23% of the homeless population are veterans
33% of the male homeless population are veterans
47% served Vietnam-era
17% served post-Vietnam
15% served pre-Vietnam
67% served three or more years
33% were stationed in war zone
25% have used VA homeless services
85% completed high school/GED, compared to 56% of non-veterans
89% received an honorable discharge
79% reside in central cities
16% reside in suburban areas
5% reside in rural areas
76% experience alcohol, drug or mental health problems
46% are white males, compared to 34% of non-veterans
46% are age 45 or older, compared to 20% non-veterans
www.nchv.org/background.cfm#facts

Prison statistics:

There were an estimated 140,000 veterans held in state and federal
prisons. State prisons held 127,500 of these veterans, and federal
prisons held 12,500.

Male veterans were half as likely as other men to be held in prison
(630 prisoners per 100,000 veterans, compared to 1,390 prisoners per
100,000 non-veteran U.S. residents). This gap had been increasing
since the 1980s.

Veterans in both state and federal prison were almost exclusively
male (99 percent).

The median age (45) of veterans in state prison was 12 years older
than that of non-veterans (33). Non-veteran inmates (55 percent) were
nearly four times more likely than veterans (14 percent) to be under
the age of 35.

Veterans were much better educated than other prisoners. Nearly all
veterans in state prison (91 percent) reported at least a high school
diploma or GED, while an estimated 40 percent of non-veterans lacked
either. www.nchv.org/background.cfm#facts

All things considered, how will the influx of "personality disorder"
diagnosed, unemployable, uninsurable Iraq and Afghanistan vets and
their families survive in this economy? And, regardless of their
"diagnosis", what is the responsibility of the government, the
military, and their fellow citizens to these men and women who have
sacrificed so much to "keep America free?"

.

The DREAM Act and National Security

[See URL for embedded links.]

The DREAM Act and National Security

http://washingtonindependent.com/97571/the-dream-act-and-national-security

By Elise Foley
9/16/10

Some senators balked at Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's decision
to attach the DREAM Act, a measure that would help some students
become legal residents, to the defense authorization bill. It may
have been a political move, but the DREAM Act does have something to
do with defense: Because undocumented students can gain legal status
with two years of military service, it would likely be a boon for
military recruitment.

The military is behind the DREAM Act, Think Progress pointed out
yesterday. The Department of Defense's FY2010-12 Strategic Plan
specifically mentions the DREAM Act as a way to help the military
"shape and maintain a mission-ready All Volunteer Force."

Military recruitment would benefit hugely from the DREAM Act, bill
sponsor Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told Army Times in 2007. "Largely
due to the war in Iraq, the Army is struggling to meet its
recruitment goals," he said. "Under the DREAM Act, tens of thousands
of well-qualified potential recruits would become eligible for
military service for the first time. They are eager to serve in the
armed forces during a time of war."

Of course, some in the immigrants rights community question the
inclusion of the DREAM Act's military provisions altogether. The bill
originally required students to attend college or do two years of
community service, but the latter option was replaced with a military
service option with pressure from the Pentagon.

Part of this decision has to do with fairness ­ after all, it seems
wrong to ask undocumented immigrants to risk their lives for the
country and then deport them ­ but some argue the bill's language
will push more low-income young people into the military. The site
Change.org, for instance, started a petition asking Congress to
reinstate the community service provision to the bill.

.

A Route to Citizenship in Defense Bill

A Route to Citizenship in Defense Bill

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858304575498072319915164.html

Legislation Offers Illegal Residents Chance to Become Americans
Through Military Service or College; Foes Call It Amnesty

SEPTEMBER 18, 2010
By MIRIAM JORDAN

LOS ANGELES­David Cho, an honor student and leader of the UCLA
marching band, plans to join the U.S. Air Force after he graduates in
the spring­if Congress lets him.

Mr. Cho is among the potential beneficiaries of the Development,
Relief and Education for Alien Minors bill­informally known as the
Dream Act­that would give some illegal immigrants a shot at becoming
U.S. citizens.

The bill would grant six years of legal residency to high-school
graduates who have lived in the U.S. continuously for five years and
arrived by the age of 15. They would become eligible for citizenship
if they attend college or serve in the military for two years during
the legal residency period.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) said this week that he
planned to attach the Dream Act to the defense-authorization bill next week.

To supporters, the Dream Act would encourage young people to join the
military and attend college, two laudable goals.

To opponents, the bill is tantamount to an amnesty program for
children whose parents broke U.S. immigration laws.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) believes passage of the Dream Act would
entice more people to sneak into the U.S. "When you take a policy
that says you are going to reward people who have entered our country
illegally with a guaranteed pathway to citizenship, and with billions
of dollars in financial aid or benefits they would not otherwise be
entitled to, what message are we sending?" Sen. Sessions said.

Currently, students like Mr. Cho come of age in the U.S. without the
right to legally work, join the military or receive federal loans for
education. Most of these children had no say in their families'
decision to settle illegally in the U.S. Generally, they have not
been targeted for deportation, unless they have criminal records.

"I'm super stoked that it came up," said Mr. Cho, 21 years old, a
senior at the University of California, Los Angeles, who came to the
U.S. from South Korea when he was nine years old and has never been back.

The first version of the Dream Act was introduced in August 2001 with
bipartisan support. But it has languished amid efforts to pass a
comprehensive immigration overhaul. The legislation was last
introduced in October 2007.

Backers of the bill are expected to mount an aggressive campaign in
coming days. But any attempt to pass immigration legislation could
prove difficult ahead of the elections.

Pentagon officials support the Dream Act. In its strategic plan for
fiscal years 2010-2012, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense
for Personnel and Readiness cited the Dream Act as a "smart" way to
attract quality recruits to the all-volunteer force.

But Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration
Reform, a national group that advocates a curb on all immigration,
said passage of the Dream Act would divert "scarce educational
resources" to illegal immigrants.

In an interview, Rep. Steve King (R., Iowa) accused Sen. Reid of
attempting to use a "must-pass" defense bill to ram through an amnesty.

Supporters of the bill, including many with close ties to the
military and higher education, see it differently.

"Passage of the Dream Act would be extremely beneficial to the U.S.
military and the country as a whole," said Margaret Stock, a retired
West Point professor who studies immigrants in the military. She said
it made "perfect" sense to attach it to the defense-authorization bill.

Louis Caldera, secretary of the Army under President Bill Clinton,
said that as they struggled to meet recruiting goals, "recruiters at
stations were telling me it would be extremely valuable for these
patriotic people to be allowed to serve our country."

Immigrants have been eligible to enlist in the U.S. military since
the Revolutionary War. As of June 2009, foreign-born individuals
represented 8% of the 1.4 million military personnel on active duty
in the U.S. armed forces.

Many educators say passage of the Dream Act would make college
affordable for young illegal immigrants, who are entitled to K-12
schooling under a 1982 Supreme Court ruling.

About 825,000 youngsters in the country illegally would likely
qualify for legal status under the bill, according to a recent
analysis by the independent Migration Policy Institute, a Washington
think tank.

Three out of four potential Dream Act beneficiaries reside in 10
states, led by California, Texas, Florida, New York and Arizona.

The University of California's 11 undergraduate campuses enroll
181,700 students. Among them are 340 to 630 illegal immigrants,
including Mr. Cho, the UCLA senior, according to the UC system.

Mark Yudof, president of the UC system, has been a vocal supporter of
the Dream Act. "We are looking forward to the bill moving through the
legislative process and passing," said Chris Harrington, a spokesman
for the UC system.

Without the Dream Act, Mr. Cho will have no legal job prospects when
he graduates, he said.

But during a recent band rehearsal ahead of a football game at the
Rose Bowl, Mr. Cho was optimistic about his opportunities in the long
term. "My dream is to become a U.S. senator."
--

Write to Miriam Jordan at miriam.jordan@wsj.com

.

Recession, unemployment spur increase in military recruitment

[2 articles]

Recession, unemployment spur increase in military recruitment

http://www.tbd.com/articles/2010/09/recession-unemployment-spur-increase-in-military-recruitment-12163.html

September 17, 2010

Just a few years after the some branches of the military lowered
requirements to meet recruitment goals, there's now a surge of
better-educated recruits who have struggled to find work in down economy.

That's keeping military recruiters like U.S. Army Capt. Rusty Mason very busy.

"In the past year," Mason says he's seen a "conservative 25 percent
increase" in the number of college grads becoming recruits in
Northern Virginia, and across the country.

Brandon Branch graduated in May and, after a frustrating
private-sector job search, signed up for the Army -- despite the
ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"I would say you're lucky if you get an interview," Branch lamented.
"I put in about 500 resumes, and TSA was about the only one I got a call from."
Another fellow job seeker, Malcolm Leigh, added, "I sent about 100
(résumés), you get four or five interviews -- it's really tough out there."

Last year the number of college grads signing up for the military
jumped nearly 17 percent from 2008. Among the perks the Army offers:
free health care and housing, something the private sector probably
cannot match.

Beth Asch, a senior economist with the Rand Corporation and an expert
in military recruiting, has a simple explanation: "I think the spike
is due to the economy," she told ABC 7's Kris Van Cleave in an
interview via Skype. "We're seeing people who otherwise would get
good job in the civilian labor market finding that's not so possible
and looking to the military."

Wesley Cho has a master's degree, but still struggled to find a job.
Soon he'll be a United States Marine.

"One nice thing about military is it's relatively secure, has good
benefits, and a pretty solid career choice," Cho said.

The Pentagon says so far this year, 99 percent of recruits have at
least a high school diploma -- the goal is 90 percent.

What's particularly striking about the trend, Van Cleave notes, is
the number of the college graduates who are opting to enlist and not
go to Officer Candidate School, which traditionally has been more
common among those with college degrees.

--------

More state graduates opting for military

http://www.fdlreporter.com/article/20100917/FON0101/9170409/More-state-graduates-opting-for-military

By Sharon Roznik
sroznik@fdlreporter.com
September 17, 2010

B.J. Otte has known since he was a sophomore in high school he wanted
to enlist in the military.

A 2010 graduate of Winnebago Lutheran Academy, the teen will be
spending the next year training as a poolie for the United States Marine Corps.

"I felt it would be a very good way to start off my life, teach me
discipline and a lot of life lessons. The pride of belonging to the
Marines is something you can't replace," said Otte, of Fond du Lac.

He isn't alone. The number of Wisconsin high school graduates joining
the military is at an all-time high, according to a high school exit
poll conducted by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

In 2009, more than 3 percent of graduating seniors ­ a total of 2,077
students ­ said they planned to enlist. This is the highest the rates
have been in a decade ­ even higher than 2001, when the 9/11 attacks
spurred an increase in enlistment.

Economy, patriotism

Recruiters say the lengthy economic downtown, which has created
double-digit unemployment rates in some parts of Wisconsin, and a
strong sense of patriotism, especially in rural areas, have made
recruiting easier, according to a review by the Wisconsin Center for
Investigative Journalism (WCIJ).

Otte says he leaves for boot camp on March 28, 2011. He doesn't plan
to make the Marines a career but hopes to find one in the military
that involves mechanics.

"I'll be OK if I go to war. I know God has a plan for everything," he said.

Army Staff Sgt. Justin Stuckart at the recruiting office in Fond du
Lac said his employer is one of the only ones out there offering job
incentives.

"Typically we recruit between 50 and 60 people out of Fond du Lac
County. That is higher than two or three years ago. A big part is the
economy. Right now, a young man or woman with a four-year college
degree can't get a job at Walmart, plus no one is retiring," Stuckart said.

Compared to some other areas, Fond du Lac County stands out as
pro-military and pro-soldier, Stuckart noted.

Waupun High School counselor Dan Niederkorn said each year about 3 to
5 percent of Waupun seniors enroll in the military. The school's 5
percent enrollment in 2009 is tied with Fond du Lac High School as
the highest when compared with 10 other area high schools (see listing).

"From talking with students, most of the time, those
who end up in the military have a close relative who
served. There's some family lineage connected to it,"
he said.

Accessibility

In 2010, 26 out of 515 students ­ or 5 percent ­
of Fond du Lac High School students said they
planned to enlist in the military, according to career
specialist Vikki Winkler.

She attributes the higher numbers to ASVAB (military
multi-aptitude) testing in schools, more
announcements and accessibility to the school's
career center.

"I have had representatives from each branch of the
military scheduled for a monthly visit. This has been
the standard in the past. When military personnel
are present, they are located next to our commons
during student lunch hours," she said.

Federal law requires schools to release basic
contact information about students (called directory
information) to military recruiters. However, schools
are required to honor a family's request that such
information not be provided.

The Rev. Ted Drewson said each year he calls Fond
du Lac High School to take his children off the list.

"I find it interesting that schools can give out
personal student information to the military. Yet the
Fond du Lac Ministerial Association tried to plan a b
accalaureate service for the kids graduating, but
we couldn't get any information about them," he
said.

Drewson said he supports the military and
recruiters in schools for those students interested
in signing up.

"I know they have to recruit. However, my son was
called by recruiters quite a number of times and he
did not want to join," Drewson said.

North Fond du Lac Superintendent Aaron Sadoff said
he supports all military branches coming into the
schools to present "honest information about the
military and provide career options for our
students."

"I think the military is a noble profession. Freedom
is not free, and it is our past, current and future
military men and women (and their families) who
pay the price for all of our freedoms," he said.

.

Pinnacle: new program for recruitment

Economy helps military recruiters reach goals

http://www.publicopiniononline.com/localnews/ci_16098344

By ROSCOE BARNES III

Military recruiters are having a banner year at a time when the
economy is worsening, and people are seeking secure employment.

The economy might not be the biggest reasons for people joining the
military these days, but it is a likely reason for some of the
recruits, according to local recruiters.

Local recruiters for the Army, Navy and Air Force reported recently
that they are meeting their goals for this fiscal year, which began
in October. In some cases, they have surpassed their goals as they
see more young people, including more females, sign up straight out
of high school.

For some recruits, the military is a good option after being laid
off, according to Air Force Recruiter Tech. Sgt. Philip Barnhart. For
many, however, the benefit of college is their biggest concern, he said.

There also are those who simply want to serve their country,
according to some recruiters.

Press reports across the nation are showing that the largest branches
of the military -- the Army, Air Force, Marines and Navy, are
exceeding their recruiting goals this year. At the same time, about
99 percent of the new recruits have a high school diploma, and scores
on the military entrance exam are at an all-time high, reported The
Dallas Morning News.

"Military recruiting has never been better," the paper reported.

In some ways, people throughout the United States, including Franklin
County, see the military as a silver lining in the storm clouds of a
bad U.S. economy.

Army recruiting

Recruiters in the U.S. Army Recruiting in Chambersburg have been so
successful they are allowed to take two weeks off, according to Sgt.
1st Class Raymond Truax, assistant station commander.

"We're off until Monday, the 27th, because we're doing so well," Truax said.

His station put 38 people into the regular Army, and 17 into the Army
Reserve, he said. The number of people signing up is about the same
as last year, he said.

He believes the economy and other issues have played a role in the
military's recruitment efforts.

"The main reason they are joining is because they want to serve their
country," he said. "A lot of them have good jobs."

The age range for the new recruits is 18 to 25. Twenty-five percent
of them are female.

Last year, recruits had questions about going to war. Five to 10
percent of them also had lost jobs due to layoffs, Truax said. This
year, the issue of war has not been raised, and many recruits seem
more concerned about education benefits, Truax said.

The one benefit that seems to attract young people is the Post 9/11
GI Bill, Traux said: "It entitles the military to transfer the
soldiers' education benefits to their spouses and children."

Navy recruiting

Navy recruiting also is going well, according to Cmdr. Sam Pennington
of the Navy Recruiting District in Pittsburgh. His recruiting
stations have met their goal, he said.

"They achieved more than their fair share," he said, adding the
success was achieved because of the leadership of the petty officer
in charge of the recruiting station.

On the national level, the Navy had a goal of 29,506 for active duty,
according to Cmdr. Thomas Sliski, executive officer for the Navy
Recruiting District in Pittsburgh. They surpassed the goal with a
total of 29,774.

For the Navy Reserve, the national goal for this year was 2,095. They
topped the goal with a total of 2,171.

In Franklin County, the Navy met its goal of recruiting 14 people. Of
that number, eight were female, according to Sliski. The Chambersburg
station is still looking for one person to join the Navy Reserve.

"The problem is, we are so specific, if they don't find the exact ...
right kind of person, we won't put them in," Sliski said. "They have
to find the right person at the right time."

The recruiting success is similar to last year, he said. Those
signing up for the regular Navy are between the ages of 18 and 30.

"The economy is having an impact," Pennington suggested. "We
definitely got more people who are more interested. With more people,
we can select the very best."

A large percentage of the Navy recruits are straight out of high
school. Pennington believes they are reading the newspapers and can
see the military as a great way to ensure future success.

"It's also a great place to get training and excellent benefits," he said.

Of those joining the Navy, most have said their main reason is for
the training opportunity, "and that's always number one," Pennington
said. Next, they want to travel and see the world. Travel is followed
by benefits, he said.

Air Force recruiting

As for the Air Force, people are joining for all sorts of reasons,
according to Tech. Sgt. Philip Barnhart, recruiter for the
Chambersburg station.

"For some of them, it may have something to do with the economy, and
they're looking at the benefits that the Air Force provides," he
said. "They're also looking at the technical training and certifications."

For the current fiscal year, the Air Force recruited a total of 32
people locally, Barnhart said. Some of the recruits are still in high
school under the delayed entry program.

Those who have joined are between the ages of 18 and 24. Five were female.

"Some people are just looking for something different," Barnhart
said. "Some are looking for challenges, new experiences, and
something out of the ordinary in the Air Force."

Barnhart believes there are some people who chose the Air Force
because they needed employment. He has not personally dealt with such
cases, he said: "But I'm sure some have been put in that position by
being laid off. Some want better job security that would help them
out for their future."

As with other branches of the military, none of this year's recruits
have voiced concern about war in Iraq or Afghanistan, Barnhart said.

Schools, social networking

Recruiters use a number of methods, including popular technology, to
reach their targeted audience. Although some of them use Facebook
MySpace, and Twitter, practically all of them use face-to-face visits
at high schools and colleges.

"We spend time in high schools and colleges," Traux said. "High
schools are very open. They're good, friendly schools."

Recruiter Barnhart spent his lunch hour Wednesday in the cafeteria of
Greencastle-Antrim High School, where he set up a table with
literature about the Air Force.

The school cafeteria is commonly used because it allows students to
come up and inquire about the military, Barnhart said.

"My job is to allow them to ask questions. Normally they can't come
to the recruiter's office," Barnhart said. "At the school I have
face-to-face time to explain the benefits and college education, as
well as what basic training is like, and how to qualify."

According to Barnhart, the schools generally allow one military
service branch at a time to use the cafeteria. When on college
campuses, Barnhart said he gets to tell students about the Air
Force's Officer Training School through which the recruits can become
commissioned officers.

Navy recruiters, like the Army recruiters, also use Facebook,
Twitter, and MySpace, according to Pennington.

Public Opinion placed calls to recruiters for other branches of the
military. Those calls were not returned by presstime.
--

Roscoe Barnes III can be reached at 262-4762 or rbarnes@publicopinionnews.com.
--

Pinnacle: new program for recruitment

The military, especially the Army, is taking steps to push
recruitment efforts to the next level, according to a press release
from Bill Irwin, public affairs officer with the U.S. Army Recruiting
Battalion in Harrisburg.

The Harrisburg station was recently selected to launch what Irwin
calls a "new, innovative recruiting process." It's known as Pinnacle.

Chambersburg recruiters say the high-tech program has not yet reached
Franklin County, but that it is on its way.

"The U.S. Army is taking extreme measures to bring innovation to the
recruiting process," Irwin wrote in his press statement. "Since the
adoption of an all volunteer force model in the 1970s, it has become
evident that recruiters nationwide needed to adopt and explore
methods to better accomplish its core mission of 'providing the
strength of the Army.'"

According to Irwin, communication technology is making it nearly
impossible for recruiters to communicate the same way they have for
the past 40 years.

New technology used through Pinnacle includes online video games;
Xbox, Xbox 360 game and arcade integration; Career Navigator
(interactive video system); event kiosks that include computers,
monitors; Pocket projectors (allows recruiters to be out in the
community); mobile recruiter workstations; and LiveScan computer
programs (for background checks).
--

U.S. Army Recruiting

(October 2009 to September 2010)

* Number recruited (Army): 38

* Number recruited (Army Reserves): 17

* Age range: 18 to 27

* Gender: 25 percent females, 75 percent males

* Primary recruitment locations: High schools and colleges

* Main reason for enlistment: Service to country

* Other reasons: Education benefits, and need for employment

* Those needing employment: 5 to 10 percent (due to layoffs)

* Concern last year: Going to war

* Popular benefit: Post 9/11 GI Bill (benefits soldier and soldier's family)

* Social network site: Facebook

CONTACT:

Chambersburg US Army Recruiting Station

Chambersburg Mall

3055 Black Gap Rd

Chambersburg, PA, 17202

Phone: 264-3018

Email: 1E2B@usarec.army.mil

Websites: http://www.goarmy.com

and http://www.army.mil

U.S. Naval Recruiting

(October 2009 to September 2010)

* Number recruited (Navy): 14

* Number recruited (Navy Reserves): 0 (Goal 1)

* Age range: 18 to 30

* Gender: More than 20 percent females (total 8)

* Primary recruitment locations: High schools and colleges

* Main reason for enlistment: Training opportunity

* Other reasons: Travel, benefits (medical, dental, etc.)

* Those needing employment: Few

* Popular benefit: Training is always number one

* Social network sites: Facebook, MySpace, Twitter

CONTACT:

Chambersburg U.S. Navy Recruiting Station

Chambersburg Mall

3055 Black Gap Rd.

Chambersburg, PA, 17202

Phone: 263-2500

Websites: http://www.navy.com

and http://www.navy.mil/swf/index.asp

U.S. Air force Recruiting

(Since January 2010)

* Number recruited: 32

* Age range: 18 to 24

* Gender: five females

* Primary recruitment locations: High schools and colleges

* Main reason for enlistment: College benefits

* Other reasons: Job security, technical training, certifications,
associate degree through Community College of the Air Force

* Those needing employment: Few

* Popular benefit: Education

* Social network site: No

CONTACT:

Chambersburg US Air Force Recruiting Station

Chambersburg Mall

3055 Black Gap Rd

Chambersburg, PA, 17202

Phone: 264-4517

Email: Philip.barnhart@us.af.mil

Website: http://www.airforce.com

.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

As Iraq winds down, U.S. Army confronts a broken force

[See URl for informative sidebar.]

As Iraq winds down, U.S. Army confronts a broken force

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/09/17/100771/as-iraq-winds-down-us-army-tries.html


By Nancy A. Youssef
September 17, 2010

WASHINGTON ­ When Lt. Col. Dave Wilson took command of a battalion of
the 4th Brigade of the 1st Armored Division, the unit had just
returned to Texas from 14 months traveling some of Iraq's most
dangerous roads as part of a logistics mission.

What he found, he said, was a unit far more damaged than the single
death it had suffered in its two deployments to Iraq.

Nearly 70 soldiers in his 1,163-member battalion had tested positive
for drugs: methamphetamine, cocaine and marijuana. Others were
abusing prescription drugs. Troops were passing around a tape of a
female lieutenant having sex with five soldiers from the unit. Seven
soldiers in the brigade died from drug overdoses and traffic
accidents when they returned to Fort Bliss, near El Paso, after their
first deployment.

"The inmates were running the prison," Wilson said.

What Wilson had to deal with, however, was hardly an isolated instance.

With the U.S. drawdown in Iraq, the Army is finally confronting an
epidemic of drug abuse and criminal behavior that many commanders
acknowledge has been made worse because they'd largely ignored it
during nearly a decade of wars on two fronts.

The Army concedes that it faces a mammoth problem.

A 350-page report issued in July after a 15-month investigation into
the Army's rising suicide rate found that levels of illegal drug use
and criminal activity have reached record highs, while the number of
disciplinary actions and forced discharges were at record lows.

The result, the Army found, is that "drug and alcohol abuse is a
significant health problem in the Army." Where the Army once rigidly
enforced rules on drug use, it got sloppy in the rush to get soldiers
ready for the battlefield, commanders say. Officers who once trained
soldiers on everything from drug abuse to financial planning had only
enough time to get their troops ready for battle.

The number of misdemeanors that soldiers committed ­ including
traffic infractions, drunk driving and being absent without leave ­
rose to 50,523 in fiscal year 2009 ­ a sign, the report said, that
"good order and discipline" were declining in the ranks. Five years
earlier, the number was 28,388.

No disciplinary action was taken in at least 15,074 of the 2009
cases, the report said.

From 2001 to 2009, only 70 percent of DUIs and 61 percent of
positive drug tests were referred to the Army's substance abuse
program, and drug testing became haphazard, as well: In 2009, 78,517
soldiers went untested for illegal drug use. Statistically, the Army
estimated, that meant that 1,311 offenders probably escaped detection.

Sexual assault more than tripled in the same period, from 302 cases
in 2001 to 1,015 in 2009.

The increase in drug abuse and bad behavior came at the same time
that the Army enlisted thousands of recruits who in previous years
would have been ruled ineligible because of drug or other criminal
convictions. According to the report, nearly 20 percent of the
soldiers who've enlisted in the Army since 2004 ­ perhaps as many as
10,000 ­ would "not have been eligible for entry into the Army before."

"I think we've got to understand that the force we have today is
different from the force we had 10 years ago," said Gen. Peter W.
Chiarelli, the vice chief of staff of the Army, who oversaw the study
and is heading up the Army's response to it. "We've got kids that are
going to have some behavioral health issues. The real hard part for
us is to determine, 'OK, I am willing to help this kid with
behavioral health issues, but how long can I help him? How long can I
do that and make sure I have a force capable of doing whatever the
nation asks it to do?' "

Chiarelli said that simply discharging soldiers with drug and
behavioral problems wasn't an option.

"We can't use these people up, have them develop a problem and then
throw them away and not take care of them. There is no way. I can't
be part of an organization like that," he said. "Part of the reason
they're having the problem is the situation we put them into."

Wilson said he found a failure of leadership to be a major factor in
the deterioration of his unit.

When the brigade returned from Iraq in December 2007, many commanders
were moved to other units, and new soldiers were rushed through the
system to get them to the battlefield quickly, without the proper guidance.

As a result, 37 of the 69 drug abusers in Wilson's battalion belonged
to one company of 200, he said. When he was a company commander a
decade ago, having five soldiers test positive would have been
considered a lot, he added.

"We found that we had leaders that were dealing with combat stress
issues as well. So when you have sick leaders, that leader can't care
for the soldiers properly," said Wilson, who commanded 1,163 of the
brigade's 3,800 soldiers. "The drug problem was just a symptom of the disease."

Wilson said he turned his unit around by keeping leaders in place,
disciplining soldiers and making time during combat training for
things such as leadership and the perils of drug abuse. He had them
read the motivational books "Who Moved My Cheese?" and former Notre
Dame coach Lou Holtz's "Winning Every Day." Positive drug tests later
fell to five a year.

The brigade also kicked 200 soldiers out of the Army.

"There were times I walked out of my headquarters at 2 and 3 in the
morning and went back in an hour and a half later for PT," or
physical training, Wilson said. "There are times the Army requires us
to give up a little more juice than normal."

Chiarelli said he was hopeful that the drawdown of American troops in
Iraq would give the Army more time to address the issue.

"As our soldiers start to spend more time at home, we can start to
dust off some of the things we used to do ... and start tracking
these kids, make sure we are taking care of them," he said.
--

ON THE WEB

Read the Army report, Health Promotion, Risk Reduction, Suicide Prevention
http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e1/HPRRSP/HP-RR-SPReport2010_v00.pdf

.